Psychological horror relies on suggestion, atmosphere, and the mind’s own fears rather than explicit gore. This subtlety makes its neural impact harder to pin down than straightforward shock horror. A simplistic claim—either the genre is wholly beneficial or wholly harmful—fails to capture the interplay of emotion regulation, arousal, and individual sensitivity. Our aim is to outline the tradeoffs so readers can evaluate the genre’s fit for themselves.
By mapping both the advantages and constraints, we avoid the trap of propaganda‑style reviews that glorify thrill at the expense of mental wellbeing. Instead, we ground our discussion in empirical observations, mindful of the diverse reactions people experience when watching these films.